1f4b
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legalethics.com</title>
	<link>http://www.legalethics.com</link>
	<description>Focusing on the ethical issues associated with the use of technology by legal professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Cloud Services &#8212; DropSmack</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=521</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=521#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Electronic Files</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Security</category>

		<category>Cloud</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article describing the use of DropSmack to target networks via DropBox.  In addition to broader considerations lawyers should consider before using cloud services, developments like this highlight the need for education regarding technology and security.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/security/dropsmack-using-dropbox-to-steal-files-and-deliver-malware/9332">interesting article</a> describing the use of DropSmack to target networks via DropBox.  In addition to <a href="http://www.legalethics.com/?cat=108">broader considerations lawyers should consider before using cloud services</a>, developments like this highlight the need for education regarding technology and security.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=521</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carrier IQ and security of certain mobile devices</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=507</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=507#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Confidentiality</category>

		<category>Electronic Files</category>

		<category>E-mail</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Privacy</category>

		<category>Security</category>

		<category>Cellular phones</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting, perhaps troubling, issue raised with respect to security of certain mobile devices. Read more about Carrier IQ  (http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/how-much-of-your-phone-is-yours-20111115/, http://androidsecuritytest.com/features/logs-and-services/loggers/carrieriq/carrieriq-part2/, http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/secret-software-logging-video.  A somewhat long video of how this works is available here. http://tinyurl.com/cwcyjoc. Although there will likely be more articles about this in the media in the future, this highlights potential security and related [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting, perhaps troubling, issue raised with respect to security of certain mobile devices. Read more about Carrier IQ  (<a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/how-much-of-your-phone-is-yours-20111115/">http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/how-much-of-your-phone-is-yours-20111115/</a>, <a href="http://androidsecuritytest.com/features/logs-and-services/loggers/carrieriq/carrieriq-part2/">http://androidsecuritytest.com/features/logs-and-services/loggers/carrieriq/carrieriq-part2/</a>, <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/secret-software-logging-video">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/secret-software-logging-video</a>.  A somewhat long video of how this works is available here. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/cwcyjoc">http://tinyurl.com/cwcyjoc</a>. Although there will likely be more articles about this in the media in the future, this highlights potential security and related issues for users of mobile devices.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=507</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Issues Ethics Opinion on Confidentiality and the Use of E-mail and Technology To Transmit Client Information</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=498</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=498#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Confidentiality</category>

		<category>California</category>

		<category>E-mail</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Attorney-client privilege</category>

		<category>Privacy</category>

		<category>Rules of Conduct</category>

		<category>Ethics Opinions</category>

		<category>Discipline</category>

		<category>Security</category>

		<category>Cloud</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California Formal Opinion 2010-179 outlines the lawyer&#8217;s duties when transmitting or storing confidential client information when the underlying technology may be susceptible to unauthorized access by third parties. An attorney’s duties of confidentiality and competence require the attorney to take appropriate steps to ensure that his or her use of technology in conjunction with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ethics.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=wmqECiHp7h4%3d&#038;tabid=837">California Formal Opinion 2010-179</a> outlines the lawyer&#8217;s duties when transmitting or storing confidential client information when the underlying technology may be susceptible to unauthorized access by third parties. An attorney’s duties of confidentiality and competence require the attorney to take appropriate steps to ensure that his or her use of technology in conjunction with a client’s representation does not subject confidential client information to an undue risk of unauthorized disclosure. Because of the evolving nature of technology and differences in security features that are available, the attorney must ensure the steps are sufficient for each form of technology being used and must continue to monitor the efficacy of such steps.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=498</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Surveys Use of Evidence from Social Networking Sites in Personal Injury Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=496</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=496#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Confidentiality</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Privacy</category>

		<category>Social Networking</category>

		<category>Security</category>

		<category>Social Computing</category>

		<category>Evidence</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article is here.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202476307983&#038;src=EMC-Email&#038;et=editorial&#038;bu=LTN&#038;pt=Law%20Technology%20News&#038;cn=20101217_ltnda&#038;kw=Social%20Networks%20in%20Personal%20Injury%20Litigation">here</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=496</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi fi risks: Add-on to Firefox purportedly allows hijacking of social networking user accounts when on unsecured wi fi</title>
		<link>
85b
http://www.legalethics.com/?p=490</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=490#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Social Networking</category>

		<category>Security</category>

		<category>Social Computing</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article with several links is here.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article with several links is <a href="http://www.abanet.org/media/youraba/201011/article11.html">here</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=490</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi Fi on Planes a Security Risk?</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=485</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=485#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Security</category>

		<category>wifi</category>

		<category>Cellular phones</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers travel and use wi fi on board planes.  This may be a here-and-gone phenomena, however.  With the recent hullabaloo over full body scans, a major threat appears to be wi fi:  the capability of a terrorist to use an on-board computer to dial up a cell phone in the cargo hold [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers travel and use wi fi on board planes.  This may be a here-and-gone phenomena, however.  With the recent hullabaloo over full body scans, a major threat appears to be wi fi:  the capability of a terrorist to use an on-board computer to dial up a cell phone in the cargo hold rigged to a bomb and set it off.  The story, slightly to the side of our usual focus, is <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/airline-wi-fi-sparks-743309.html">here</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=485</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

0

