<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legalethics.com</title>
	<link>http://www.legalethics.com</link>
	<description>Focusing on the ethical issues associated with the use of technology by legal professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Jones Day: Linking to Our Site is Trademark Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=453</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=453#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Websites</category>

		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Blogs</category>

		<category>Intellectual Property</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Privacy</category>

		<category>Domain Names</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an article here.  Oh, and here.  Oh, and this one.
There&#8217;s a webpage, blockshopper.com that tracks who buys what property and for how much in certain upscale neighborhoods.  Some Jones Day lawyers bought property in  those neighborhoods, and that truthful, factual information was posted on the site, along with truthful factual links to the firm&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an article <a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2008/09/jones-days-gros.html">here</a>.  Oh, and <a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/09/14/jones-day-big-law-firm-small-ethics/">here</a>.  Oh, and this <a href="http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2008/09/trademark-abuse.html">one</a>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a webpage,<a href="http://chicago.blockshopper.com/"> blockshopper.com</a> that tracks who buys what property and for how much in certain upscale neighborhoods.  Some Jones Day lawyers bought property in  those neighborhoods, and that truthful, factual information was posted on the site, along with truthful factual links to the firm&#8217;s website, and truthful, factual links to the individuals&#8217; bios on the firm webpage. </p>
<p>Jones Day filed this <a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-08-28-Jones%20Day%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf">complaint</a> for trademark infringement.   The sum of the alleged confusing and illegal conduct is using a link to the firm&#8217;s website and linking to the two lawyers&#8217; bios who bought houses.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=453</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are your nonlawyer employees blogging?</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=432</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=432#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Blogs</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting piece here discussing the blogs of secretaries, paralegals, and other law firm employees. This is an interesting issue and one that may be flying below many firms&#8217; radars.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting piece <a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2007/06/the_blogger_out.html">here</a> discussing the blogs of secretaries, paralegals, and other law firm employees. This is an interesting issue and one that may be flying below many firms&#8217; radars.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=432</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law firm blogs as advertising?</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=152</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=152#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Blogs</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/2006/10/12/law-firm-blogs-as-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A law.com article discusses whether law firm blogs could be regulated as advertising.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly.jsp?id=1160471119300">law.com article</a> discusses whether law firm blogs could be regulated as advertising.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=152</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosecutor reprimanded for comments on personal blog</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=25</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>California</category>

		<category>Blogs</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a first, a judge has blasted a lawyer for demeaning blog comments about opposing counsel.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a first, <a HREF="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1146139204085">a judge has blasted a lawyer</a> for demeaning blog comments about opposing counsel.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=25</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
