1f45
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legalethics.com</title>
	<link>http://www.legalethics.com</link>
	<description>Focusing on the ethical issues associated with the use of technology by legal professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Kentucky Proposes Fee, Regulation of Social Networking Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=491</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=491#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Attorney-client relationship</category>

		<category>Discussion Groups</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<category>Rules of Conduct</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<category>Discipline</category>

		<category>Social Networking</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article with links to the proposal are here.  To avoid getting any Kentucky readers in trouble, please don&#8217;t blog about this! 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article with links to the proposal are <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/seeking_clients_via_facebook_in_ky._bar_may_regulate_social_media_comments?utm_source=maestro&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=tech_monthly">here</a>.  To avoid getting any Kentucky readers in trouble, please don&#8217;t blog about this! <img src='http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=491</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky judges may participate in social networking sites such as Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=503</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=503#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Websites</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<category>Social Networking</category>

		<category>Social Computing</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky judges may participate in social networking sites such as Facebook but a judge must carefully consider the nature of the relationship with an attorney. Judicial Ethics Opinion JE-119 (January 20, 2010).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky judges may participate in social networking sites such as Facebook but a judge must carefully consider the nature of the relationship with an attorney. <a href="http://courts.ky.gov/commissionscommittees/JEC/JEC_Opinions/JE_119.pdf">Judicial Ethics Opinion JE-119</a> (January 20, 2010).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=503</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public comment open on proposals to amend Kentucky advertising rules</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=57</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=57#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposals drafted by the Kentucky Attorneys&#8217; Advertising Commission are open for public comment until September 1, 2003.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.loubar.org/advertising_regs/index.cfm">Proposals</a> drafted by the Kentucky Attorneys&#8217; Advertising Commission are open for public comment until September 1, 2003.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=57</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky Ethics Opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=213</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=213#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 02:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<category>Ethics Opinions</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/kentucky-ethics-opinions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky ethics opinions are available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kybar.org/246">Kentucky ethics opinions</a> are available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=213</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=212</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=212#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 02:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<category>Rules of Conduct</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/kentucky-rules-of-professional-conduct/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Bar offers the Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct. A separate version is offered by the Legal Information INstitute.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Bar offers the <a href="http://www.kybar.org/Default.aspx?tabid=237">Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct</a>. A <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/ethics/ky/code/">separate version</a> is offered by the Legal Information INstitute.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=212</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky Bar Association</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=211</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=211#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 02:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/kentucky-bar-association/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky Bar Association website is available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.kybar.org/">Kentucky Bar Association</a> website is available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=211</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky lawyers may exchange unencrypted e-mail with clients; websites constitute regulated advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=214</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=214#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 1997 02:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Confidentiality</category>

		<category>Websites</category>

		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>E-mail</category>

		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1997/06/03/kentucky-lawyers-may-exchange-unencrypted-e-mail-with-clients-websites-constitute-regulated-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ KBA Opinion E-403 is an official advisory opinion authorizing the transmission of unencrypted email communications and a characterizes web pages as advertising, rather than solicitation  (May 16, 1997). Note: the appendix is a copy of ISBA Opinion No. 96-10 and is much longer than the opinion itself.

]]></description>
	
228
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.kybar.org/documents/ethics_opinions/kba_e-403.pdf">KBA Opinion E-403</a> is an official advisory opinion authorizing the transmission of unencrypted email communications and a characterizes web pages as advertising, rather than solicitation  (May 16, 1997). Note: the appendix is a copy of ISBA Opinion No. 96-10 and is much longer than the opinion itself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=214</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

0