1f57
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legalethics.com</title>
	<link>http://www.legalethics.com</link>
	<description>Focusing on the ethical issues associated with the use of technology by legal professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Kentucky Proposes Fee, Regulation of Social Networking Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=491</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=491#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Attorney-client relationship</category>

		<category>Discussion Groups</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>Kentucky</category>

		<category>Rules of Conduct</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<category>Discipline</category>

		<category>Social Networking</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article with links to the proposal are here.  To avoid getting any Kentucky readers in trouble, please don&#8217;t blog about this! 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article with links to the proposal are <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/seeking_clients_via_facebook_in_ky._bar_may_regulate_social_media_comments?utm_source=maestro&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=tech_monthly">here</a>.  To avoid getting any Kentucky readers in trouble, please don&#8217;t blog about this! <img src='http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=491</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY St. Bar Ass&#8217;n Approves Gmail Use Despite Contextual Ad Scanning</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=452</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=452#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Confidentiality</category>

		<category>Websites</category>

		<category>E-mail</category>

		<category>Internet Use</category>

		<category>Attorney-client privilege</category>

		<category>New York</category>

		<category>Privacy</category>

		<category>Rules of Conduct</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<category>Discipline</category>

		<category>Ethics Walls</category>

		<category>Malpractice</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York State Bar Association concluded that lawyers could use gmail and comply with the duty of confidentiality  despite the fact that email is &#8217;scanned&#8217; by Google to place contextual ads.  The committee warned that this sort of unthinking, automated review was proper, but not human review.  N.Y. St. B. Ass’n. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York State Bar Association concluded that lawyers could use gmail and comply with the duty of confidentiality  despite the fact that email is &#8217;scanned&#8217; by Google to place contextual ads.  The committee warned that this sort of unthinking, automated review was proper, but not human review. <a href="http://www.nysba.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Ethics_Opinions&#038;TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&#038;CONTENTID=13652"> N.Y. St. B. Ass’n. Comm. Prof. Eth. Op. 820 (Feb. 8, 2008)</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=452</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City Bar Association Addresses Electronic File Copying and Retention</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=450</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=450#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hricik</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Electronic Files</category>

		<category>e-Discovery</category>

		<category>Attorney-client relationship</category>

		<category>E-mail</category>

		<category>Computer Use</category>

		<category>New York</category>

		<category>Ethics Opinions</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Formal Opinion 2008-1 (July 2008), the Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York addressed various issues concerning the organization, delivery, and the ability to charge clients for delivery of electronic files after the end of a representation.  An earlier Wisconsin opinion on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a title="Formal Opinion 2008-1" href="http://www.nycbar.org/ethics/ethics-opinions-local/2008-opinions/799-a-lawyers-ethical-obligations-to-retain-and-to-provide-a-client-with-electronic-documents-relating-to-a-representation-">Formal Opinion 2008-1</a> (July 2008), the Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York addressed various issues concerning the organization, delivery, and the ability to charge clients for delivery of electronic files after the end of a representation.  An earlier Wisconsin opinion on the same subject is <a title="Wisconsin Op" href="http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Wisconsin_ethics_opinions&#038;TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&#038;CONTENTID=48462">here.</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=450</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National lawyer associations ethically may place membership directories on  Internet web sites, categorized by practice areas</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=128</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=128#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>States</category>

		<category>Websites</category>

		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Arizona</category>

		<category>UPL</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A national lawyer association ethically may place its membership directory on its Internet web site, categorized by practice areas. See Arizona Opinion 99-10 (September 1999). The association may want to: 1) list State Bar admissions for each member, to avoid unauthorized practice of law concerns; and 2) clarify that the ?practice area? designations do not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A national lawyer association ethically may place its membership directory on its Internet web site, categorized by practice areas. See <a href="http://www.azbar.org/Ethics/EthicsOpinions/ViewEthicsOpinion?id=504">Arizona Opinion 99-10</a> (September 1999). The association may want to: 1) list State Bar admissions for each member, to avoid unauthorized practice of law concerns; and 2) clarify that the ?practice area? designations do not necessarily mean that the lawyers are certified specialists in those fields.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=128</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio lawyers may be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=312</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=312#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1999 23:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>
1602
Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Lawyer Referral Services</category>

		<category>Advertising</category>

		<category>Ohio</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1999/07/07/ohio-lawyers-may-be-listed-in-the-online-membership-directory-of-a-professional-association/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is proper for an Ohio lawyer  to be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association.  Opinion  99-3 (June 4, 1999). An online membership directory of attorneys in a professional association is considered a law directory intended primarily for the use of the legal profession and is permitted.  The opinion notes that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is proper for an Ohio lawyer  to be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association.  <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;rct=j&#038;q=&#038;esrc=s&#038;source=web&#038;cd=3&#038;cad=rja&#038;sqi=2&#038;ved=0CD0QFjAC&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.supremecourt.ohio.gov%2FBoards%2FBOC%2FAdvisory_Opinions%2F1999%2FOp%252099-003.doc&#038;ei=ZA7BUNbkDKrV0gGdyICgBA&#038;usg=AFQjCNFzRhn9dSNV2M098BkGfDC2r28wKw">Opinion  99-3</a> (June 4, 1999). An online membership directory of attorneys in a professional association is considered a law directory intended primarily for the use of the legal profession and is permitted.  The opinion notes that it should not be construed as blanket approval of attorney listings in other types of online directories.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=312</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi Bar Association</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=239</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=239#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 04:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Mississippi</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/mississippi-bar-association/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mississippi Bar web site is available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.msbar.org/">Mississippi Bar</a> web site is available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=239</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota State Bar</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=236</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=236#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 04:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Minnesota</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/minnesota-state-bar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minnesota State Bar Association website is available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.mnbar.org/">Minnesota State Bar Association</a> website is available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=236</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Bar of Michigan</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=232</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=232#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<category>Michigan</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/state-bar-of-michigan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Bar of Michigan web site is available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.michbar.org/">State Bar of Michigan</a> web site is available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=232</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California State Bar Association</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=138</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=138#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 03:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>California</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California State Bar Association is available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.calbar.ca.gov/state/calbar/calbar_home.jsp">California State Bar Association</a> is available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=138</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Bar Association</title>
		<link>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=373</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalethics.com/?p=373#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 03:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peterk</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Virginia</category>

		<category>Bar Association</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalethics.com/wordpress/1998/11/08/virginia-bar-association/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Virginia Bar Association website is available online.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Virgi<a href="http://www.vba.org/">nia Bar Association</a> website is available online.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalethics.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=373</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

0